Skip navigation

Monthly Archives: May 2009

This is from an article in the SEMA eNews letter:

“By a 50-4 vote, the House Energy Committee approved federal legislation to provide a government voucher to consumers who buy a new car in exchange for scrapping a less fuel-efficient vehicle. Similar legislation is expected to be considered in the U.S. Senate in early June when lawmakers return from the Memorial Day recess. SEMA is urging lawmakers to include a provision to require that scrapped vehicles be less than 25 years old as a means of protecting vehicles that are valued by hobbyists or may be a source of recyclable parts for use on restoration projects.

Under the legislation, a scrapped vehicle must get less that 18 mpg (15 mpg for heavy pickups and vans). The car buyer would receive a $3,500 voucher if they bought a new passenger car that was at least 4 mpg higher than the older vehicle or a new pickup truck/SUV that was at least 2 mpg higher than the old truck. They would receive a $4,500 if the passenger car was at least 10 mpg higher and the truck/SUV was at least 5 mpg higher. The program would mandate that the engine block and drivetrain be destroyed. The program would last up to one year, authorize $4 billion in spending and potentially scrap one million older cars and trucks.

“SEMA is working with lawmakers to mitigate some of the legislation’s unintended consequences and its potential damage to the automotive aftermarket,” said Chris Kersting, SEMA’s president and CEO. “These common-sense proposals will ensure that the government is not spending $3,500 or $4,500 on a vehicle that may only be worth a few hundred dollars but may have potential value to vehicle collectors and to promote the benefits of parts recycling.”

A vehicle that is 25 years old or older is rarely driven and does not contribute to the nation’s dependence on foreign oil. A 25-year exclusion would also guarantee that older cars that have an historic or aesthetic value are not inadvertently crushed.

SEMA’s recommendations are intended to reduce the damage a vehicle scrappage program would impose on thousands of independent repair shops, auto restorers and recyclers, customizers and their customers across the country. SEMA will continue to promote alternative incentive programs that will help clean the environment, provide for vehicle and parts recycling, and preserve collector cars for future generations. For additional information, contact Stuart Gosswein.”

 Classic Automotive Restoration Specialists is an active member of SEMA/SAN but would like to do more. We would like to reach out to car club members and classic vehicle owners to stress the importance of staying involved to keep our hobby alive. The most compelling argument against the scrappage of vehicles 25 years or older is in bold font above.  In order to keep this arguement relevant we will be offering tips for maintaining your vehicle. Many of these tips are “do-it-yourself”. It is important to keep your car running at peak efficiency. If your club has a newsletter we would be happy to provide you with a copy of these articles as we release them, you can send an email here to request a copy.

This week we were happy to host the Coker Tire leg of the 2009 Street Rodder Road Tour.  The tour started in Chattanooga at the Coker Tire headquarters where they had a show and auction to raise money for the Victory Junction Gang Camp. On Tuesday they presented the camp with $2500, enough for one child to attend camp this summer.  After they finished up they headed our way. We knew they would be worn out so we pulled out the grills and served up some burgers and hot dogs. Then gave them and the local chapter of the AACA a tour of our shop and offered one of our lifts in case anyone needed to check something to keep their cars going strong as they continue on to their next destination of Ocean City where the next leg of the tour will pick up. We love to see enthusiasts out promoting the hobby are always happy to show them around and answer any questions. 

You can read about all their adventures here: http://www.streetrodderweb.com/roadtour/0905sr_coker_tire_tour_blog_2/index.html

2009 Road Tour Coker Blog 2    2009 Road Tour Coker Blog 2    2009 Road Tour Coker Blog 2     2009 Road Tour Coker Blog 2

Model legislation to create a vehicle registration classification for street rods, replicas and custom vehicles was approved by the North Carolina House Transportation Committee and now moves to the floor for a vote by all House lawmakers.  The bill is a product of negotiations between SEMA and the hobbyist network in North Carolina.  H.B. 861 retains the key components of the SEMA-model bill while relieving vehicle owners of unfair title branding and inspection concerns.  Please also be aware that the Senate version of the bill (S.B. 820) will also soon get a hearing and we will be counting on you to send messages to Senate committee members.  

We Urge You to Contact All Members of the North Carolina House of Representatives (Contact Information Below) Immediately to Request Their Support for H.B. 861

  • H.B. 861 provides specific registration and titling classes for street rods, custom vehicles and replicas.  Street rods are of a pre-1949 vintage; customs are of the post-1949 era. 
  • H.B. 861 allows for the use of non-original materials and creates a titling and registration criterion that assigns replica vehicles the same model year designation as the production vehicle intended to be replicated.
  • H.B. 861 requires that the title of a replica vehicle must clearly indicate that the vehicle is a replica and not an original.
  • H.B. 861 only holds street rods, customs and replicas to the equipment standards specified by law during the model year listed on the title of the vehicle.
  • H.B. 861 provides an avenue by which the state can accurately and fairly title and register these specialty vehicles.
  • H.B. 861 recognizes the immeasurable amount of time, money and attention automotive enthusiasts invest in their hobby cars.  Street rods, customs and replicas are the same crowd pleasers that participate in exhibitions and as parade vehicles, and whose owners regularly contribute to charities and civic events.  This legislation represents an opportunity to acknowledge this family hobby and to protect it for future generations. 

DON’T DELAY!  Please contact all members of the North Carolina House of Representatives immediately to urge support for H.B. 861

To do so, please copy and paste the following addresses into the “To:” field of your e-mail:

Alma.Adams@ncleg.net; Kelly.Alexander@ncleg.net; Martha.Alexander@ncleg.net; Lucy.Allen@ncleg.net; Cary.Allred@ncleg.net; Marilyn.Avila@ncleg.net; Jeff.Barnhart@ncleg.net; Larry.Bell@ncleg.net; Hugh.Blackwell@ncleg.net; Curtis.Blackwood@ncleg.net; Dan.Blue@ncleg.net; John.Blust@ncleg.net; Jamie.Boles@ncleg.net; Alice.Bordsen@ncleg.net; Van.Braxton@ncleg.net; William.Brisson@ncleg.net; Larry.Brown@ncleg.net; Harold.Brubaker@ncleg.net; Angela.Bryant@ncleg.net; Justin.Burr@ncleg.net; Pearl.Burris-Floyd@ncleg.net; Becky.Carney@ncleg.net; George.Cleveland@ncleg.net; Lorene.Coates@ncleg.net; Nelson.Cole@ncleg.net; Tricia.Cotham@ncleg.net; Jim.Crawford@ncleg.net; Bill.Current@ncleg.net; Leo.Daughtry@ncleg.net; Margaret.Dickson@ncleg.net; Jerry.Dockham@ncleg.net; Nelson.Dollar@ncleg.net; Beverly.Earle@ncleg.net; Bob.England@ncleg.net; Bill.Faison@ncleg.net; Jean.Farmer-Butterfield@ncleg.net; Susan.Fisher@ncleg.net; Elmer.Floyd@ncleg.net; Dale.Folwell@ncleg.net; Phillip.Frye@ncleg.net; Pryor.Gibson@ncleg.net; Mitchg@ncleg.net; Rick.Glazier@ncleg.net; Bruce.Goforth@ncleg.net; Melanie.Goodwin@ncleg.net; Robert.Grady@ncleg.net; David.Guice@ncleg.net; Jim.Gulley@ncleg.net; Joe.Hackney@ncleg.net; Phillip.Haire@ncleg.net; Larry.Hall@ncleg.net; Ty.Harrell@ncleg.net; Pricey.Harrison@ncleg.net; Dewey.Hill@ncleg.net; Mark.Hilton@ncleg.net; Hugh.Holliman@ncleg.net; Bryan.Holloway@ncleg.net; Julia.Howard@ncleg.net; Sandra.Hughes@ncleg.net; Pat.Hurley@ncleg.net; Verla.Insko@ncleg.net; Darren.Jackson@ncleg.net; Maggie.Jeffus@ncleg.net; Linda.Johnson2@ncleg.net; Earl.Jones@ncleg.net; Carolyn.Justice@ncleg.net; Carolyn.Justus@ncleg.net; Ric.Killian@ncleg.net; James.Langdon@ncleg.net; David.Lewis@ncleg.net; Jimmy.Love@ncleg.net; Marvin.Lucas@ncleg.net; Paul.Luebke@ncleg.net; Nick.Mackey@ncleg.net; Grier.Martin@ncleg.net; Danny.McComas@ncleg.net; Darrell.McCormick@ncleg.net; Pat.McElraft@ncleg.net; William.McGee@ncleg.net; Marian.McLawhorn@ncleg.net; Mickey.Michaux@ncleg.net; Grey.Mills@ncleg.net; Annie.Mobley@ncleg.net; Tim.Moore@ncleg.net; Wil.Neumann@ncleg.net; Bill.Owens@ncleg.net; Earline.Parmon@ncleg.net; Garland.Pierce@ncleg.net; Shirley.Randleman@ncleg.net; Ray.Rapp@ncleg.net; Johnathan.Rhyne@ncleg.net; Deborah.Ross@ncleg.net; Efton.Sager@ncleg.net; Ruth.Samuelson@ncleg.net; Mitchell.Setzer@ncleg.net; Tim.Spear@ncleg.net; Paul.Stam@ncleg.net; Edgar.Starnes@ncleg.net; Fred.Steen@ncleg.net; Sarah.Stevens@ncleg.net; Randy.Stewart@ncleg.net; Bonner.Stiller@ncleg.net; Ron.Sutton@ncleg.net; Cullie.Tarleton@ncleg.net; Thom.Tillis@ncleg.net; Joe.Tolson@ncleg.net; Russell.Tucker@ncleg.net; Alice.Underhill@ncleg.net; William.Wainwright@ncleg.net; Edith.Warren@ncleg.net; Ray.Warren@ncleg.net; Jennifer.Weiss@ncleg.net; Roger.West@ncleg.net; Jane.Whilden@ncleg.net; Laura.Wiley@ncleg.net; Winkie.Wilkins@ncleg.net; Arthur.Williams@ncleg.net; Larry.Womble@ncleg.net; Michael.Wray@ncleg.net; Douglas.Yongue@ncleg.net
Thank you for your prompt attention.  Please e-mail a copy of your letter to Steve McDonald at stevem@sema.org

Got this joke sent to me…thought it was cute, so I wanted to share

Gynecologist who became a mechanic

A Gynecologist had become fed up with malpractice insurance
and Medicare paperwork, and was burned out. Hoping to try
another career where skilful hands would be beneficial, he
decided to become a mechanic. He went to the local
technical college, signed up for evening classes, attended
diligently, and learned all he could.

When the time of the practical exam approached, the
Gynecologist prepared carefully for weeks, and completed the
exam with tremendous skill. When the results came back, he
was surprised to find that he had obtained a score of 150%.

Fearing an error, he called the Instructor, saying, ‘I
don’t want to appear ungrateful for such an outstanding
result, but I wonder if there is an error in my grade.’
The instructor said, ‘During the exam, you took the
engine apart perfectly, which was worth 50% of the total
mark.

You put the engine back together again perfectly,
which is also worth 50% of the mark.’ After a pause,
the instructor added, ‘I gave you an extra 50% because
you did it all through the muffler.’